Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Negotiation is not sexy

As a Model UN delegate, an enthusiast for international relations, and, I would like to think, a somewhat accomplished negotiator, I am always a little miffed when, like last Monday, I am confronted with the extent to which negotiation is undervalued. It's considered worthwhile and necessary of course, butt simply put, in our society, negotiation is not sexy. Credit is rarely given where credit is due. For example, Al Gore is the only Kyoto delegate I can name. Of the people who negotiated the four plus two treaty that reunified Germany, only Eduard Shevarnadze, the Soviet delegate, is known to me, and only because he later served as president of Georgia. Without researching it, I could not name anyone present during the negotiations of the Oslo and Dayton Accords; just to name some of the most important negotiations of my lifetime. So naturally, when the Serbian and Kosovar Prime Ministers met for the first time on Monday, during a meeting of the UN Security Council, it took incredibly good luck for me to find out about it, by finding a copy of the Vienna Currier at the Niagara Falls bus terminal (I have no idea how it got there) and even then it was only two sentences at the bottom of page 10.

Reading the transcript of the meeting, in particular the social niceties spoken by the president at the very beginning, I can only imagine the amount of work that went into making the meeting happen. Since no one will, let me say the following: To the diplomats from New York City, to Pristina, to Belgrade and elsewhere, though nothing substantive was decided at the meeting, just getting these two men in the same room a huge step in the right direction, and I salute for it.


As for the meeting itself, it began with a statement by General Farid Zarif, head of the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK), followed by statements by Ivica Dačić (Serbia), Hashim Thaçi (Kosovo), and all fifteen members of the Council. All of what was said was fairly routine. General Zarif described the situation in Kosovo, where the status quo has been more less maintain, precarious calm with continued instances of ethnically motivated violence, the Prime Ministers made statements of mutual non-recognition and politely accused each other of illegitimacy, the NAM and China pushed for further negotiations, Russia supported Serbia, and the US and the EU pushed for recognition of Kosovo's independence. 

What I find far more interesting is how these things were said. As I said earlier, the social niceties are particularly telling. The language use by Gérard Araud, the French representative, more less matched that of the Non-Aligned States while speaking as President of the Council, referring to Hashim Thaçi by his name only, but addressing him as His Excellency the Prime Minister of Kosovo while speaking for the French Republic. To me this suggests that the NAM, probably by simple strength in numbers, controls the UN's political position vis à vis Kosovo. 

Another interesting contrast in this respect, is that the NAM states all thanked Hashim Thaçi for his statement, while the Chinese representative, though making a similar statement on all other points, merely stated that he had merely “listened attentively to the statement made by Mr. Thaçi,” probably wanting to placate Russia who used the same sentence, word for word, at the beginning of their statement.
The final point that interests me, is that Ivica Dačić insinuated that certain countries, probably the EU and the US, have been playing political games with the UNMIK budget. According to Prime Minister Dačić, the General Assembly deliberately underfinanced the mission, making it necessary to rely more heavily on the, in his opinion illegitimate, Kosovar authorities in order to fulfil the mission's mandate.